Nov 6, 2010
Nov 4, 2010
FreeSchool Presents – Steve Kado
Steve Kado (Los Angeles)
Presentation this Saturday
4.30pm - 5.15pm 6 November
Studio 2
Gertrude Contemporary
200 Gertrude Street Fitzroy
This is a Free School event and places are limited - the first 50 people to register by emailing freeschoolmelbourne@gmail.com will be admitted
Please make 'Steve Kado' the subject of your email - each person may book for one or two people
~
This event precedes the nearby opening of Christopher LG Hill's Flowers of Romance
and Sean Peoples + INRI Cristo's '*see image' and Steve Kado's October Jr at Y3K Gallery
'October Jr'
If the success of a model depends on it's resemblance to a source then how much less than the thing itself does a model have to be? If a model is always something like it's source isn't it always also something more, namely a model? The argument, I suppose, is that a model is more in total than anything it could represent: it has to be both an abstraction of another thing (1/2) and it's own thing in it's own right (1). That's the math. A model of a thing is 1 1/2 times more of a thing than the whole original thing. I'd like to show you all this new 3/4 scale model of October 12 that I made.
Presentation this Saturday
4.30pm - 5.15pm 6 November
Studio 2
Gertrude Contemporary
200 Gertrude Street Fitzroy
This is a Free School event and places are limited - the first 50 people to register by emailing freeschoolmelbourne@gmail.com will be admitted
Please make 'Steve Kado' the subject of your email - each person may book for one or two people
~
This event precedes the nearby opening of Christopher LG Hill's Flowers of Romance
and Sean Peoples + INRI Cristo's '*see image' and Steve Kado's October Jr at Y3K Gallery
'October Jr'
If the success of a model depends on it's resemblance to a source then how much less than the thing itself does a model have to be? If a model is always something like it's source isn't it always also something more, namely a model? The argument, I suppose, is that a model is more in total than anything it could represent: it has to be both an abstraction of another thing (1/2) and it's own thing in it's own right (1). That's the math. A model of a thing is 1 1/2 times more of a thing than the whole original thing. I'd like to show you all this new 3/4 scale model of October 12 that I made.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)